Blogs
Sensory Processing DifficultiesThis is a general term meaning that the challenges a person may face, could be due to how the brain is processing information received from the senses. All the incoming information to the brain comes via the senses, so you really need a bit more information, as all it essentially means is that the difficulties are due to how the brain processes the incoming information from the senses, which is not specific enough to mean much. The researchers examined how the distribution of NAA in the frontal and parietal lobes related to fluid intelligence and found that energy metabolism in the left lateralized frontal-parietal brain region predicts fluid intelligence. For this study, the Beckman researchers used magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) to measure N-acetyl aspartate (NAA). NAA is a biochemical marker used to gauge the neural energy production within specific brain regions.
Following a review ofthe literature on hemispheric differences, Goldberg, Podell, and Lovell (1994)have suggested the following principle of hemispheric specialisation ….. Daigneaultet al then exposed 259 normal adults to seven selected frontal lobe tests, anda factor analysis of the results revealed five “prefrontal functionalconstructs”, as follows ….. Lezak is another who has pointed to the problems of assessing executivefunctions (eg. Lezak, 1982).
This suggests that the brain’s relative size, rather than its absolute size, plays a more crucial role in cognitive development. When comparing brain sizes between species, we must also account for body size. A larger animal typically has a larger brain simply because it has a bigger body to support. This idea is known as the “Encephalization Quotient” (EQ), which measures brain size relative to body size. Humans, with our relatively large brains compared to body size, score very high on this scale, indicating that we have evolved to have a brain larger than expected for our body size. Homo erectus, who appeared around 1.9 million years ago, had brains ranging from 600 to 1,100 cubic centimeters.
Those, on theother hand, which need to be flexible and solve problems develop the “uncommittedcortex” needed to support the necessary higher functions. It istherefore commonly accepted that the best indicator of brain power is forebraindevelopment in general, and frontal lobe development in particular. Primates,for example, have been large-brained throughout their known history (Jerison,1987), and the highest grade of encephalisation is shared by humans andcetaceans (dolphins). Figure 2 shows some of the steps on the evolutionaryladder leading ultimately to H. From early thinkers like Aristotle to modern neuroscientists, the idea that our brain’s size could be directly related to intelligence has been both an intriguing and controversial one.
This all happens very early in life and relies on both of our eyes receiving visual input. The period of early life when our brains are developing is called the critical period. During the critical period, synapses that receive visual stimulation and pass on action potentials into the visual cortex are retained and strengthened. Synapses that do not receive visual stimulation, so the neurones between them are not firing, are removed. This means that if visual stimulation does not occur during the critical period (i.e. if a baby is born with cataracts which obscure vision or if they are born in a cave) then their visual cortex will not develop properly because many of the synapses will have been destroyed.
IQ tests are also unreliable, as many factors, including fatigue or a psychiatric condition, can influence the result. This means that your IQ might fluctuate depending on which day you take the test. BarbaraWilson (MRC, Cambridge,first author of the BADS package, and editor of the journal NeuropsychologicalRehabilitation) discussed whether memory disabilities could ever beeffectively treated ….. Coltheartsaw the primary clinical decision as being whether to go for”compensation” of a function or its “restoration”. He thenwarned that this decision would never be easy until assessments were improvedto the point of identifying whether neural resources for restoration wereactually available.
Early hominids, the ancestors of modern humans, had much smaller brains than we do today. However, despite this size difference, early humans were capable of remarkable advancements that shaped the course of human history. In October 2013, researchers cerebrumiq from University of Jyväskylä in Finland reported that children with poor motor skills also have poorer reading and arithmetic skills. The Finnish study found that children who performed poorly in agility, speed, and manual dexterity tests also had lower reading and arithmetic test scores in first through third grades. Across the board, children with better performance in motor tests scored higher in reading and arithmetic tests.
For example, the average brain size of men is slightly larger than that of women, yet studies suggest there are no significant differences in intelligence between genders. Additionally, people with larger brains don’t necessarily score higher on IQ tests than those with smaller brains. One of the oldest assumptions about brain size is that a larger brain equates to higher intelligence. While this idea seems logical on the surface, it oversimplifies the relationship between brain size and cognitive abilities. So, let’s unpack this further by exploring how brain size relates to cognitive function and intelligence.
The development and use of tools further facilitated this shift, providing early humans with better access to resources and a more varied diet. This, in turn, created selective pressures for larger brains capable of solving problems and creating new technologies. While running, I was daydreaming and spacing out, but also ruminating about all this research in a very laid-back and laissez-faire way. I consciously “unclamped” my prefrontal cortex, and patiently waited for insights to bubble up. ” moment, I dictated a text message to myself into my phone as a reminder, so that I wouldn’t forget about the idea before I got back to my computer to write this blog post.
Because there is insufficient time for neural impulses to travel from your brain to your muscles after you have sensed the stimulus, and for your muscles contract to click on the mouse (or trackpad or touchscreen), you must have started your mouse click well before you were consciously aware of the visual stimulus. A table in the link shows average reaction times, adjusted for age (reaction times tend to slow with age, especially after 60). Amongst other things, I’m hoping The Great British Intelligence Test will show us is what we can do, not only to maximize but also to protect our brain power.
